Your editorial yesterday on the mayoral election said "This paper has done its best to be even-handed".
In
this same eve of poll edition, Zac Goldsmith for the Conservatives had a
big positive front-page headline (shouting out from your sandwich
boards across London), the main article on page 1, most of page 2 and
a double-page spread on pages 4 and 5.
Sadiq Khan had
a small article on page 6. (The Greens and Womens' Equality Party had
later small articles, UKIP was mentioned in a process story and the
LibDems had nothing at all).
I humbly suggest your words and actions don't match.
Yours,
They meant they tried to equal coverage to Zac Goldsmith (incoming) and Boris Johnson (outgoing).
ReplyDelete